Responsibility to Enhance Quality of Life †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Responsibility to Enhance Quality of Life. Answer: Introduction: In the given case study, Kushalni faces an ethical obligation. Kushlani is the IT Production manager who has been assigned the task of carrying out trials of the task of soldering the chips with the pins of the processor by humans. This task was previously carried out by robots, however the error rate was very high and the cost of manufacturing the robots was also very high. The task when carried out by humans produced better results and improved accuracy. However the technicians faced headaches and eye strain due to looking at a brightly lit object through microscope. The management when informed, chose to neglect the complaints of the technicians. Thus in this case Kushlani clearly has a moral dilemma of whether to carry on the production of chips by human or not The relevant stakeholders in this scenario include the technicians who are assigned the duty to carry on production of the microchips, the management and the Kushlani, the It manager. The values of primacy of public interest, enhancement of quality of life and competence are involved in the aforementioned scenario (Acs.org.au 2018). It can be said that Kushlani, being the It manager has the moral responsibility to act in the best interest of the public. He also has the responsibility to enhance the quality of life of the stakeholders involved. In this case thus in order to uphold his responsibility of enhancing the quality of life of the technicians he must stop the production of micro chips by such technicians. He also has the responsibility to work diligently for the company who is also a stakeholder. Thus the ethical dilemma arises. It can be said that if Kushlani continues the production of the microchips by the technicians, the health of such technicians would be adversely affected. However, in such a case the management would be pleased. On the other hand if Kushlani decides to pay attention to the complaints of the technicians and stop the production of microchips by humans, such technicians would not be subjected to adverse health conditions and their quality of life would be enhanced. However, in such a case the management would be displeased as producing microchips by robots would be more costly to the management. In accordance with the workplace health and Safety act 2011, It can be said that Business owners have the responsibility to maintain health and safety in the workplace. In the given scenario Kushlani can discuss the ethical dilemma with the colleagues, managers and family members for making the ethical decision The decision of stopping the production of micro chips by technicians would be ethically correct and the same can be stated in accordance with the Workplace Health and Safety Act 2011. It can be said that the decision of stopping the production of microchips by humans would make Kushlani feel that she acted fairly and in accordance with the ACS code of ethics and Leal regulations. Reference List: Acs.org.au. (2018). [online] Available at: https://www.acs.org.au/content/dam/acs/acs-documents/Code-of-Ethics.pdf [Accessed 30 Mar. 2018]. Acs.org.au. (2018). [online] Available at: https://www.acs.org.au/content/dam/acs/rules-and-regulations/Code-of-Professional-Conduct_v2.1.pdf [Accessed 30 Mar. 2018]. Workplace Health and Safety Act 2011 Legislation.gov.au. (2018).Work Health and Safety Act 2011. [online] Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2017C00305 [Accessed 3 Apr. 2018].